Rafik v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8398-2017 Date of Decision: 17.03.2017 Rafik ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. B.S.Virk, DAG, Haryana.

INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner-Rafik has filed this 2nd petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.433 dated 04.12.2014, registered at Police Station Udyog Vihar, District Gurgaon, under Sections 457, 396, 412 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Notice of motion has been issued. Learned State counsel appeared and contested the instant petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and gone through the record. From the record, I find that earlier bail petition of the petitioner was dismissed on merit vide order dated 08.10.2015. In the order dated 08.10.2015, it has been discussed that Laxman Singh, guard was murdered and clothes from the factory was taken away. It is also discussed that four bundles of cloth have already been recovered as per the disclosure statement of accused-petitioner.

Parveen Kumar 2017.03.17 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-8398-2017 /2/ Now, no change in circumstances has been shown to this Court by learned counsel for the petitioner for grant of bail. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

However, trial Court is directed to expedite the trial by giving short adjournment or by adjourning the case on day to day basis, if required. Investigating Officer/Station House Officer of the concerned police station is directed to produce all the remaining prosecution witnesses for examination before the trial Court on the earliest date. 17.03.2017












    




  




    Parveen Kumar 2017.03.17 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document