Anil @ Risky v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-8459 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 16, 2017 Anil @ Risky

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.P.S.Jammu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.B.S.Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.1004 dated 04.11.2016 under Sections 307, 120-B, 34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Hisar City, District Hisar.

Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel appeared and contested the petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that as per the allegations, three unknown youths, alighted from the white coloured car and came to the complainant. All of them fired upon the complainant with the intention to Vineet Gulati 2017.05.16 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-8459 of 2017 -2kill him, which hit on his right hand. Fires were also shot aiming at Raj Kumar @ Raju, which hit on his legs and on another person, namely Satyawan, who was taking juice from the juice cart of Raj Kumar @ Raju. As per prosecution version, the present petitioner was driving the car and no injury has been attributed to him. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the complainant, injured and eye witness have not supported the prosecution version and turned hostile.

The present petitioner has been in custody since 23.11.2016. He is not required for any investigation or interrogation purposes. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till disposal of the case. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. May 16, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.05.16 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh