Vijay Kumar v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-8624-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-8624 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 12, 2017 Vijay Kumar ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. M.S. Kang, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, DAG, Punjab.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 42 dated 21.02.2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section 408 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station City Kapurthala.

Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required for further investigation.

In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed Jyoti 2017.07.13 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-8624-2017 -2and the order dated 28.03.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) July 12, 2017 JUDGE Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jyoti 2017.07.13 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document