Ajit v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-8733 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 19, 2017 Ajit

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.B.S.Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.07 dated 07.01.2017 under Sections 147, 149, 323, 341 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Agroha, District Hisar.

Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel appeared and contested the petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that the only non-bailable offence, as argued, is under Section 506 IPC.

The petitioner has already joined the investigation. He is not Vineet Gulati 2017.04.19 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-8733 of 2017 -2required for custodial interrogation. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by sending the petitioner to custody. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and without discussing the facts of the case in minute details and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case, where the petitioner is entitled to benefit of grant of anticipatory bail. Therefore, the present petition is accepted and the order dated 16.03.2017 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute. April 19, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.04.19 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh