Vikas @ Happy v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-23267-2026 Date of decision: 01.05.2026 VIKAS @ HAPPY ......Petitioner

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA .......Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Mr. Sushil Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Paras Talwar, Senior DAG, Haryana.

***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 151 dated 29.07.2023, registered under Section(s) 302, 201, 404, 120-B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Bond Kalan, District Charkhi Dadri. 2.

Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that the case of the petitioner is identical to co-accused Sumit to whom concession of regular bail has already been granted by this Court vide order dated 30.03.2026 passed in CRM-M-51637-2025.

3.

Counsel for the respondent-State on the other hand does not dispute the aforesaid facts and admits that the case of present petitioner is at parity with above mentioned co-accused persons. VISHAL SHARMA 2026.05.01 19:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-23267-2026 -24.

I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties and have gone through the documents appended alongwith the present petition.

5.

Without commenting on the merits of the present case and taking into consideration that the similarly placed co-accused has already been granted concession of regular bail and the petitioner has clean antecedents, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

6.

The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. 7.

It is made clear that the petitioner shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witnesses in any manner directly or indirectly.

8.

The observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and the Trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of available material.

(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) MAY 01, 2026 JUDGE Vishal Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2026.05.01 19:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document