← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRR/4564/2015disposed of

Gulzar Singh And ANR. v. State Of Punjab

2015-12-17Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal2 pages

 

  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRR-4564-2015(O&M) Date of decision : 17.12.2015 Gulzar Singh and another ...... Petitioners versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present :

Mr. Sachin Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Amarjit Kaur Khurana, Addl. AG, Punjab.

***

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed against the judgment dated 11.02.2015 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Tarn Taran, whereby the petitioners have been convicted under Sections 148, 323, 149, 324. 326, 342, 452 IPC.

On 28.11.2015 the following contention was noticed:- "Learned counsel has argued that the petitioners were ordered to be released on probation but they bonafide felt that they had been acquitted and consequently did not fulfil the condition of probation and have been arrested and are now ready to fulfil the condition of probation." POOJA SHARMA 2015.12.19 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

 

  Custody certificates filed in Court by way of affidavit of Ravinder Kumar Sharma, PPS, Superintendent, Central Jail, Amritsar are taken on record. As per the custody certificates, the petitioner No.1Gulzar Singh has undergone actual sentence of 02 months and 17 days while the petitioner No.2-Daljit Kaur has undergone actual sentence of 01 months and 10 days out of the total sentence of two years. Learned Additional Advocate General has very fairly and graciously accepted that if the petitioners are now ready to fulfil the conditions of probation they should not be denied the benefit thereof. In the circumstances, the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Tarn Taran for a period of one month and in case they now fulfil the conditions of probation they will be released as per the said order. However, if even on this occasion they do not fulfil the conditions of probation this petition would be deemed to have been dismissed. Petition stands disposed of.

Since the main case has been decided, the pending criminal miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) 17.12.2015 JUDGE Pooja sharma-I POOJA SHARMA 2015.12.19 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh