Sham Sunder v. Anita Dhingra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRR 3446 of 2016 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION :- 06.11.2024 Sham Sunder and others

...Petitioners

Versus

Anita Dhingra

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate with Mr. Lakshay Goel, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Behl, Advocate for the respondent.

*** SUMEET GOEL , J.

(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the instant petition as a compromise deed has been entered into between the parties, terms whereof have been reduced into writing vide a deed dated 01.09.2023. Dismissed as withdrawn, for the nonce.

The parties are at liberty to seek revival of the petition on showing sufficient cause.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 06.11.2024 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2024.11.06 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment