Neelam Pathak v. State Of Punjab And Another
Criminal Revision No. 747 of 2014 (O&M) -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Criminal Revision No. 747 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.08.2016 Neelam Pathak .....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present:
Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.S.Aulakh, AAG, Punjab with ASI Hardeep Singh. Mr. Vishal Munjal, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL) CRM-7649-2014 Heard.
Application is allowed for the reasons stated therein. Delay of 5 days in filing the petition is condoned. CRR-747-2014 The petitioner has filed this revision assailing the order vide which the trial Court summoned the petitioner as an additional accused. State counsel on instructions from ASI Hardeep Singh states that charge had been framed and all the prosecution witnesses have been examined and the case is at the stage of defence. The trial is almost over. The prosecution has closed its evidence.
Petition is disposed of. The petitioner may raise all the pleas GURPREET SINGH 2016.08.05 11:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Criminal Revision No. 747 of 2014 (O&M) -2before the trial Court.
(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE August 01, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No GURPREET SINGH 2016.08.05 11:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh