← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/15025/2021dismissed

Radiant Solar Energies Pvt. Ltd. v. Small Industries Development Bank Of India

2021-08-09Mr Justice Jaswant Singh,Mr. Justice Sant Parkash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 15025 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.08.2021 Radiant Solar Energies Pvt. Ltd., Sunam, District Sangrur, Punjab .......... Petitioner

Versus

Small Industries Development Bank of India .......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANT PARKASH

Present:

Mr. Pardeep Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

[ The aforesaid presence is being recorded through video conferencing since the proceedings are being conducted in virtual court ] **** JASWANT SINGH, J. (ORAL) The petitioner, a Private Limited Company, had raised a Term Loan of ` 14 Crores from the respondent - Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) in February / March 2016. Due to financial indiscipline, the said Term Loan account was declared as Non-Performing Asset (NPA) on 08.11.2017, leading to issuance of a Notice 19.12.2017 under Section 13 (2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short "the Act, 2002").

It transpires that the new management took over the affairs of the Company and a settlement was arrived at with the respondent - SIDBI on 24.09.2019 (Annexure P-4), whereby the restructuring proposal was accepted and previous notices issued under the Act, 2002, were withdrawn. The present petition has been directed against the Demand DINESH KUMAR 2021.08.10 09:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Letter dated 28.01.2021 (Annexure P-9), whereby, allegedly, illegal

C.W.P. No. 15025 of 2021 (O&M) -2demand has been raised for a sum of ` 78,27,732/-. The ground of challenge is that the amounts deposited pursuant to the settlement have been illegally adjusted against interest etc. and thereby, further prayer is for ordering the refund of an amount of ` 38,42,033/-. After arguing for some time and realizing that the writ jurisdiction, at this stage, cannot be invoked for the kind of relief claimed, counsel for petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the petition to enable his client to seek remedy before the appropriate Forum in accordance with law.

Permitted to do so.

Dismissed as withdrawn the liberty as prayed for. ( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE August 09, 2021 ( SANT PARKASH ) 'dk kamra'

JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2021.08.10 09:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document