← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaFAO/3234/2007allowed

Ved Parkash And ORS. v. Rajesh Kumar And ORS.

2024-07-25Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma7 pages

-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH . FAO32342007 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.07.2024 

   

       

CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA  

    !"# $ 

  !"# $  %& ''

SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral) ( )   *$*+ ,

 - ./.(&..0 *+  ##   ) *!- 1$  !2 ) *23!- *+

 #

(/4'$ 

# # !(5661$  !7 # 83$ *+ # , -  -

# UNDISPUTED FACTS & ) * $$# $ #  

 

" $&../&..&!9+%1# 3 $:

!$

 : 1 3-   # %;'4<':'40<( - "

 = >  - "

?  !

# $  -': ! 

      

;-   ; 

 : 

 + - 

-  ; 

!

? !-   &/./&..&@A1  3   %(5 - #  #

9  ? #  #

-2- (0B$  $  #- ## A $

# - >1

3*+$ -   44..,' ) +$  $# 

$ -  $ $$ "

#%;'4<':'40<( 4

  

#  $    #   

!     %(     

#  

!-

 -

##   %&$ +-

 $# $# 

 B @  $ 

 ! ) *$ $-

 '

( > 9+% $ :

  ## ""

 # * 



%;'4<'

:'40<( C  & A$    %(   "    $$ 

"!  -   

 

 # +# 

! $ $ - -   4 >



  *C '& B > 

  "# $#

$ 



C '& < >     #   -        "    $$#

" "

 ##  $## C '& /  $ < $  # 

   "

# #!      ) *       #   

  $  # , ;# , $  

-3SUBMISSIONS OF THE COUNSELS / D# $  *

$  *+ '# #

(/4'$ #   

- $  - -   -    -1 3 )  #$ $ 

-  $  " # 9+%  ## -

 *+  $# %;'4<':'40<( 0  # $   'A # +     $ - 6 A " # $ 

   #$

#  ANALYSIS 5  $ #* $  - 

'

 * -$ $$  # 

-

  

-  -$ # E





% ;'4<':'40<( - 

 # $ ## ;$ 



#  

!-

 -

 ##

$$ "

F>(,$#  !- $ $ 9+1# 3 #

-

 $-  ## # &../&..& * 64.'5.. : '- $ $  $  *! -

#

-    - )   ##+

-4-

# 'F 

)

-     $   #     -    -

-  ) *   #  "

## -

 #

    #  

       $  "

- 

 $DF>'&! -



&../&..& * 5 ..!9+%-  $:  #  # 

     # "      

  $ *+  $ 

    ) $   9+  %  *# # #    + $

$ +*  ;- 

$     ; 

!? -

 $ <'/+ $ ## ;$

-  ++!-

# $ $  ) 

 ##+

# 'F 

 >'&

"3

    $$ "

 $    '>'(,!  -  

F  >'(!   * (<./&..&!

# 9+% 

$  $ *+

  E 

$$  A

# '

F 

!   ##+-

# #  $# "3  $F'7AE  #

(0B   - *  $ *&/./&..& (& 4.

 # $ - G     

-5-    # $ +#   ## "

      F':!  -  

 -

#$ *+ #$ G        "

     $     -    ) *  # A %& $-  '

                !     "

"

 

 #  $% &'(

 ) *  + "  ,&-.

&/  0 "    11'23"#     #  # ) "  

 "   11'2& )  

#    )      "       )  $#      "      )    

4'2&     4'2 5   ) !'1 

.      !6'2 (    "

"

  "   1        (     

    !6      1 7 '2/ !68!8!60 .     ! '      %        .

-6-       *  +   1 !7 '23"#   +! #

  

   "     )        

      .     

  (. ;2*  # $ Ram Murti and others Vs.

Punjab State Electricity Board [2022(4) TAC 738] 

* *$

$*$ "

# *+     ((!$-

#

(/B$ # "

 $+ $ # 

# $ $ <  # $ "   $ &< (( )

   FAO1952006

   Mamta and Others Vs.

Happy and Others!# &5.<&.&B!  # 

#  

*$  

! ?   # #

 $ "

 !-

 #



"* +

  !   + 

  

 -

# *#A  ** "*+ ;2*   # 

  #      

      "

  $     *  #  * #  

   "+$$ *+F#

 #



#+ @ ! ?

# # + *  -  *  " *+  #

$  -

 #!#!##

*+

-  +)   #

* # +    #$ #$* #

   +  +

-7CONCLUSION (& A"

-$ - -*+ ;8*  *"$  !  -## +! -  ./.(&..0    ) ,   *

 # 

$ < !-

*

* E+

(4 $   ##!  *+;8*           2019 ACJ 3176     

   (2022) 5 Supreme Court Cases 107, '#  H5I   # $  $$  $#

  $

 J

 (B )   A #  +    #     

    $ # 

-

-

) *-

 $ -

$  +  )   ) *   $    #      *       $ # 

  -

 E+      ##  $    # , ) ,  # $

* ##    ) * (/   #

 ! $+!    $ ?+&<!&.&B (SUDEEPTI SHARMA)  JUDGE >   ,'    >  *  K