Rishipal v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26579-2024 Date of decision: September 6th, 2024 Rishipal .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr. Vikas Malik, Advocate for Mr. D.V. Dhindsa, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gagandeep Singh Chhina, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Petitioner is seeking the concession of anticipatory bail in FIR No.85 dated 25.04.2024 under Sections 323, 34, 506 of the IPC (Section 307 IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Raipur Rani, District Panchkula.

2.

Vide order dated 24.05.2024, the petitioner had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of the said order reads as under:- "Learned counsel inter alia contends that the petitioner has only been attributed an injury with a stick on the brother of the complainant which was opined to be simple in nature."

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of order dated 24.05.2024, the petitioner has joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. 4.

Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.09.06 13:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-26579-2024 -2factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation much less for his custodial interrogation.

5.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 24.05.2024, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) BNSS.

September 6th, 2024 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.09.06 13:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh