Amit Kumar v. Punjab State Warehousing Corporation (Pswc) And Another

  

        
  

  

 

     !

"#  $ %
& '#
(  $)&

          

 *+)  ,-  $& *)$ ,-  ** "#%$.

$,-  $&      !

"

 /$  &  -0  1  &  $   "  0   0  23$
 4 

 1$ 

 % & 5    $% $6 & $ -67

8& $ $ 6$&00$&6 $# 6)-1 9   ':

9(0"6$ &  %         9   ':

  (  &   "6  $

&&00 

$6&5  ;  0$&

 $  $ % $1  $& 9 1$$  & % $ 9  ':

("6$& $%

$6 /$&0  6 && 01$$1  "6$&&00 

#$
%&'$%(%) $%$  $6 9  ':

(/$&$ 0 # 6 )-19   ':

9(/$
&  %$ &6$  -1&,$  

<%-

$ 6$& $& "6$ $%  $6 = $, %-6 %$&6$-1 &1 0

-  0$ $&$&   $, $ %,$would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents to decide $ 6-1& 9  

':

9( by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. He further prays that till final disposal of the aforesaid statutory review petition, recovery from the salary of the petitioner may be stayed. 3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Mr. Ritish Watts, Advocate for **#.

$,-  puts in appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and files his memorandum of appearance in the Court today which is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place in the file. He submits that he has no objection in case a direction is issued to the respondent to hear and decide the st 6-1& 9   ':

 9( in a time-bound manner.

5.

In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of and the respondents are directed to hear and decide the st 6 -1& 9   ':

9( in a time bound manner and

#$
%&'$%(%) $*$ pass a speaking order, within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

6.

Since the st 6-1&is still pending and yet to be decided, it would be in the interest of justice that no further recovery will be effected from the petitioner till the disposal of the statutory review petition. !     "

   %&(+%(%)

 $$& <%2   >25 $$& "0  >25