Kalu Ram v. Amrit Pal And Another








 

 

  












 





!"!

#$
%&&
'

(






 
 (




 $
) (
 &
*
&*&
 + (&
,,,,
 
 











 
 



 
 
  
 
 


for respondent No.!"





#


#$
%%%%
&*&
 + (-
&
. (/



& 




'

 

()
*  )

 

$++,!+!-


'

 )
. 
/   
 



 


 
!+0

 
1 

1
/ 

 
 '
2 

 )

'


Learned arguing counsel for the petitioner contends that the condition of depositing 20% of the amount awarded by the trial Court for hearing the appeal is not compliable as the petitioner is not in a position to pay/deposit the said amount.

Heard.

RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.11.23 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order

  









Considering the incapability of the petitioner to deposit 20% of the awarded amount, the  

$++,!+!-


'

 )
.  is hereby modified to the extent that instead of 20%, the petitioner shall have to deposit 10% of the awarded amount. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date given by the Court; shall not seek unnecessary adjournments and shall not adopt dilatory tactics to prolong the decision of the appeal.

Disposed of in above terms.

.&*&
 + (/
0 
%-
&




























 
 






      
   
RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.11.23 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order