Ashish Chauhan v. State Of Haryana
!"#$#
%%
% &
"'
( # %
# ))))
Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG, Haryana.
* #+ (, ! " #$% Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail for the petitioner in FIR No.0078 dated 04.03.2026 registered under Section 115(2), 3(5), 308(5) & 351(3) of BNS, 2023 (Section 61(2) & 238 of BNS, 2023 added later on) (Corresponding Sections 323, 34, 386 & 506(2) of IPC, 1860 (Section 120-B & 201 of IPC 1860 added later on) registered at Police Station Model Town Rewari, District Rewari. % &%'(#%(%) ""* + ,- " "" ./ +
*"* 0 !1* ! """0 / " . ! . .
."
()(#%(%)23 +%4! - "
0*""5 * 1 !0 0 *"" 6 . / 7 89: 0
!"
+ " * " * 0!"
.". . . . !* *" 5 ! (#(;%(%)< "" ! " . !" &
!5 ." #$%2%476
:* " 5 *< 0 1 !0 =< &
. "" ! .! 5 (;%(%)> 3.
Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore-mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case, the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.
4.
Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Sandeep Kumar affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation.
5.
In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 27.04.2026 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (now 482(2) of BNSS, 2023) 6.
However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him. +
, *#