Sandeep Kaur v. State

106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.6851 of 2020 Date of Decision : 14.09.2020 Sandeep Kaur

...Petitioner

Versus

State

...Respondent

(Through video conferencing)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI BY POST

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Singh Deol, DAG, Punjab.

Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel has produced the statement of the complainant, wherein, she has stated that her son had gone to meet his friend and has already returned and therefore, the complainant does not want to pursue this petition any further.

As the petition has been taken for hearing on the basis of an email, no one appears on behalf of the complainant to confirm or object to the statement given by the complainant.

The present petition is disposed of with the observation that in case the complainant is aggrieved in any manner hereinafter, she will be at liberty to avail an appropriate remedy for the redressal of her grievances. September 14, 2020 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) aarti/naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2020.09.14 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh