Laxmi Narayan Gupta v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 147 Civil Writ Petition No.12681 of 2025 Date of Decision: May 05, 2025 Laxmi Naryan Gupta ..... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

State of Haryana & others ..... RESPONDENT(S)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN PRESENT: - Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana alongwith Mr. Saurabh Mago, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, alongwith Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate, for the respondents-HSVP.

SUDHIR SINGH, J (Oral) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to allot the plot of 3 Marla to the petitoiner under the 'Oustees Category' in lieu of his land, which has been acquired by the respondents. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that aggrieved from the inaction of the respondents, the petitioner has already served a representation dated 21.03.2024 (Annexure P-9) upon respondent No.5, but no action has been taken thereon till date. He further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if the said respondent is directed to deal with his concerns/grievances and pass appropriate order on the said representation. 3.

Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana alongwith Mr. Saurabh Mago, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondents is present in Court AVIN KUMAR 2025.05.12 09:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.

CWP No.12681 of 2025 [2] and submits that the said representation shall be considered and looked into by the competent authority, in accordance with law. 4.

Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.5 (competent authority), to look into the representation dated 21.03.2024 (Annexure P-9) of the petitioner and take an appropriate action thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order.

5.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Sudhir Singh) Judge (Alok Jain) Judge May 05, 2025 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No AVIN KUMAR 2025.05.12 09:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.