High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/9173/2017allowed

Jatin Sachdeva And ORS. v. State Of Haryana And ANR.

2017-05-12Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

Crl. Misc. No. M-9173 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-9173 of 2017 Date of decision : 12.05.2017 Jatin Sachdeva and others ......Petitioners versus State of Haryana and anr.

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Kunal Muthreja, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for respondent No. 2 **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Reply filed by learned State counsel in the Court today, is taken on record.

Quashing of FIR No. 608 dated 08.08.2016 under Sections 406/498-A/506/34 IPC (as per F.I.R offence is alleged under Section 354 IPC also), registered at Police Station Sector 55, Fairdabad is being sought on the basis of compromise deed dated 12.02.2017/09.03.2017 executed before Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. Respondent No. 2 got married to petitioner No. 1 on 25.10.2015. Due to temperamental differences, both the parties could not live together as husband and wife. The relationship between them became strained and F.I.R was registered against the petitioners on account of harassment and humiliation caused by the petitioners on the pretext of bringing less dowry by respondent No. 2.

However, the matter has now been duly compromised, on the GAURAV ARORA 2017.05.24 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-9173 of 2017 basis of compromise deed dated 12.02.2017/09.03.2017 executed before Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. In compliance of order dated 18.03.2017, report dated 01.04.2017 of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Faridabad has been received in this regard. As per report, separate statement of the complainant and joint statement of petitioners had been recorded and they stated that the matter has been duly compromised between them. The compromise has been entered voluntarily. The complainant has no objection if the F.I.R be quashed against the petitioners.

Consequently, in view of the status report dated 01.04.2017 and in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in cases of Dr. Arvind Barsaul etc. versus State of Madhya Pradesh and another 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 910, Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 429 and the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation.

Accordingly, FIR No. 608 dated 08.08.2016 under Sections 406/498-A/506/34 IPC (as per F.I.R offence is alleged under Section 354 IPC also), , registered at Police Station Sector 55, Fairdabad is quashed along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua petitioners. The petition stands disposed of.

12.05.2017 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2017.05.24 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh