Paramjeet Singh @ Pamma v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24385-2026 Paramjeet Singh @ Pamma ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent Date of Decision: 01.05.2026 Date of Uploading: 01.05.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Present:

Mr. Dhananjay Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Senior DAG, Haryana. ***** SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral) 1.

Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the BNSS') seeking grant of interim bail to the petitioner in FIR No.226 dated 09.11.2025, registered under Sections 21(c) and 27-A of the NDPS Act, at Police Station Sadar Tohana, District Fatehabad. 2.

The gravamen of the FIR in question is that the petitioner is an accused of being involved in an FIR pertaining to NDPS Act involving alleged recovery of 566 grams of heroin from the petitioner. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is contended that the petitioner is suffering from serious medical ailments including cervical pain. He has further contended that the petitioner is also suffering from continuous chest congestion and phlegm, which possibly symptoms of tuberculosis. The petitioner's wife is also suffering from serious gynaecological issues. It is further argued that proper medical facilities are not being provided in jail and, therefore, interim bail be granted to the petitioner. NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.05.01 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-24385-2026 P a g e | 2 4.

Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer of interim bail and submits that the petitioner is involved in a case involving recovery of commercial quantity of contraband, thereby attracting the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. It is further submitted that the petitioner is being provided adequate medical treatment by the jail authorities and, there is no exceptional cause made out by him for grant of interim bail. 5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6.

The allegations against the petitioner are grave in nature, involving recovery of commercial quantity of heroin. As per the submissions made by learned State counsel and further from the record, it emerges that the petitioner is under medical supervision and is being provided treatment in General Hospital, Hisar and MAMC, Agroha. It is also pertinent to note that the petitioner had earlier approached the learned Special Judge, NDPS Act, Fatehabad seeking interim bail on similar grounds, however, the said application was dismissed vide order dated 06.03.2026. Learned Special Judge, Fatehabad had noticed that there is no record of history of tuberculosis. The petitioner has failed to show any exceptional or emergent circumstance, which would necessitate his release on interim bail.

7.

Ergo, keeping in view the factual milieu of the case in hand, no ground is made out to grant the application in hand. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.

(SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE May 01, 2026 Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.05.01 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh