M/S M S Fabricator And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ORS




 



 



  



 
 !! "

#$%
#
%
  

 % !!!
   % & % % %

 

 % !!!
 %  %

#
  '(
#!
 %
!%!

 )( Present Ms. Promila Nain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Rawal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rishabh Singla, A.A.G., Punjab.

Mr. Anil Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for respondent No.3. !%!
 )(*
!
+ (, 1.

The present petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is for quashing of Complaint No. 16/2015 dated 07.07.2015 under Section 133 Cr.P.C. (Annexure P1) and orders dated 07.08.2017 and 26.10.2017 (Annexure P2) challenging the order of learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ludhiana whereby he has sought the report from the other authorities. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners are running their business by adopting the proper procedure and taking appropriate permissions from all the relevant departments i.e. Electricity, Municipal Corporation licenses etc. Moreover, petitioners are running green industries and units of the petitioners are exempted by the Pollution Board that does not require any N.O.C. from Pollution Board. It has been submitted that the impugned order has ben passed without giving any JANKI BHATT 2025.11.21 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

#-#-."/- 0
+ 1#, -- opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

3.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4.

The present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ludhiana to give proper opportunity of hearing to both the parties and pass a speaking order.

5.

Disposed of.

6.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

+!%!

 )(,  !! "

 

Janki Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2025.11.21 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh