Rakesh Kumar v. Guru Jambeshwar University Of Science And Technology And ORS.
! "# $%&%
!"
# '$ ('
% )%)%)*+ ) (')% )
$ %
#&' &
##!
%
#&' & %
"&' &
(##! ( #
)))) %)%)*+ ), - ./ *
# !! # ##!
'(+ (*,(-.-/ + '(*.,,(-.-/ '(+ (*/(-.-/ + '(*.,0( -.-/ 1.
./ -.-/ ##! & " & #2
! ! !
# " 3! !
!""# !" ! "
" ! $(
!
"
# $%&''() *+,*
-
-
.
/
1
+
1
"
!
2 3$(45/'( #
3&6(4/'$!
7
, 7
8 -"
* *
"
2
* 2 #
0
9
"
-3:;
# -
< = -3 :;
# -
:
#"
-3:;
# -
2 >
:
2 - $ Once the petition for review is dismissed, no application for clarification should be filed, much less with the change of the advocate-on-record. This practice of changing the advocates and filing repeated petitions should be deprecated with heavy had for purity of administration of law and salutary and healthy practice.
3. The application is dismissed with exemplary costs of Rs.20,000/- as it is an abuse of the process of court in derogation of healthy practice. The amount should be paid to the Supreme Court Legal Aid Services Committee within four months from today. If the amount is not paid, it should be recovered treating this direction as decree of the Court by the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee. The Registry is directed to communicate this order to the Supreme Court Legal Service Committee. The Registry is directed to
communicate this order to the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee. Application dismissed"
-
2 !
(
"! " ! "! " 4! !
# ! "! "& !
3
& #! ! # ##! # ! ###!
'567'4'+3' '2 3527389 ., .:
-.-/ +'
3 ';'583 68 4 <#"
= 4 # ! 5