Vikash Bansal v. State Of Haryana And Another

CRM-M-26816-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26816-2024 Decided on: 24.05.2024 Vikash Bansal

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Monish Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. AG, Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 22.06.2022 Sector 40, Gurugram, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC (Sections District Gurugram 120B IPC & 73/66B of IT Act added later on) 1.

Seeking quashing of the above captioned FIR, the petitioner has come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Section 482 CrPC. 2.

After arguing for some time and facing the strict opposition from the State of Haryana, counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition with a prayer that he be permitted to file a discharge application before the trial Court and the said Court be directed to answer each and every point so raised by him in the said application.

3.

Given above, petitioner is permitted to file a precise application for discharge, but such application should not be unnecessarily lengthy and if such application is filed in that case, the concerned Court shall decide the same by passing a reasoned and ANJU RANI 2024.05.24 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-26816-2024 speaking order and shall answer to each and every point taken up in the said application. Liberty further reserved to challenge the order of charges, if framed. 4.

Petition is disposed of in the terms mentioned above. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 24.05.2024 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

ANJU RANI 2024.05.24 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh