Sabir v. State Of Haryana

-1CRM-M-26528 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26528 of 2020 Date of decision: 17.11.2020 Sabir ......Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL

Present:

Mr. Satbir Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (ORAL) Case taken up through video conferencing.

Through the present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner seeks the grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.86 dated 30.06.2020, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 341, 506 and 326 IPC at Police Station Rozka Meo, District Nuh. The case of the prosecution is that on 28.06.2020 the petitioner along with others inflicted injuries on the complainant party on the basis of which the aforesaid FIR was lodged.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case; petitioner is not involved in any other criminal case; no specific injury is attributed to the petitioner and that under the interim orders passed by this Court the petitioner has not only joined the investigation but has also fully co-operated with the RAVINDER SINGH 2020.11.18 19:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-2CRM-M-26528 of 2020 investigating agency.

Learned State counsel submits that under the interim orders passed by this Court the petitioner has joined the investigation; he has also fully co-operated with the investigating agency; has also got recovered the weapon used by him in the crime and that his custodial interrogation is not required.

After considering the totality of the above facts especially that no specific injury is attributed to the petitioner; petitioner is not involved in any other criminal case; he has joined and cooperated with the investigation; no further recovery is required to be made from him and as per learned State counsel the petitioner's custodial interrogation is not required, the order of this Court dated 09.09.2020 granting ad-interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner is made absolute. Nothing observed herein-above shall be considered to be an expression of opinion by this Court on the merits of the case. (Deepak Sibal) November 17, 2020 Judge R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2020.11.18 19:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document