Roshan Lal v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-9257-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-9257 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 17, 2017 Roshan Lal ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Shekhar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. Deepak Grewal, D.A.G. Haryana.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 23 dated 21.02.2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 380, 454, 411 of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Panjokhra, District Ambala.

Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation. The investigation is still in progress but custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for further investigation. In view of above submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is Jyoti 2017.07.17 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-9257-2017 -2allowed and the order dated 18.03.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) July 17, 2017 JUDGE Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jyoti 2017.07.17 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document