Gautam Monga And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32049-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.09.2022 GAUTAM MONGA AND ORS ... Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present:

Mr. RS Sekhon,Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. KS Saini, Advocate for Mr. IS Dhaliwal, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. **** HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.(Oral) This petition has been filed for quashing of DDR No.34 dated 27.02.2020, under Sections 323, 148 and 149 IPC and Section 308 IPC (added later on), registered at Police Station Mallanwala, District Ferozepur, in FIR No.13 dated 25.02.2020 under Sections 452, 324, 323, 506, 148 and 149 IPC, at Police Station Mallanwala, District Ferozepur, along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 09.12.2020 (Annexure P-3), arrived at between the parties.

Vide order dated 29.09.2021 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate had been directed to record the statements of the parties with regard to the genuineness and authenticity of the compromise.

AMAN JAIN 2022.09.19 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-32049-2021 (O&M) -2In compliance thereof, the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Zira, has submitted a report, vide letter dated 24.12.2021, which indicates that the parties do not appear before the Magistrate for recording their statements.

In view of the above, since the parties have not bothered to appear before the Court below for recording their statements, no further order is required to be passed by this Court. Dismissed.

16.09.2022 (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) Aman Jain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2022.09.19 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment