Seema Gupta v. Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran

2024:PHHC:069387-DB



















 

 

  

!

 " "
# $%  &'
()
!'*  ( +
, -, 

 



 


 
 


 +

 ./
 ,
 0



//


 ./
 ,
 0
12 
 /

 

 
  
  




!

 "






#
$%!

  




 

&&&&



//3
,
'(!)
-  


*






!

 
% 

!
 
$

 




!!%
+, !

 
-



 




..

/0 ./.1




23 /4 ./.1

  

!

 

!!%




5

 
..

/.

./.1

$
 
+









+6 ".7/28"./.9





-
"22

  

!
 " "

5 


!

 

 !


 







  
dated 22.02.2024, rendered by this Court in CWP-29017-2023 (Raj Singh Vs. Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran). AMIT KUMAR 2024.05.18 11:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

2024:PHHC:069387-DB










Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem, for the matter in issue is squarely covered by the decision rendered in Raj Singh's case (supra), let the petition at hand be also disposed of, in the same terms.
For the reasons set out in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, and keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the same is allowed. Consequently, the petition is disposed of, in terms of Raj Singh's case (supra).



















#


//%













 























#12 
 /%















 

, -, 



6 
  : ; 6 
 $! ;:< AMIT KUMAR 2024.05.18 11:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document