High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/15137/2019disposed of

Satnam Kaur v. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd And Others

2019-05-30Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

CWP-15137-2019 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-15137-2019 Date of decision: - 30.05.2019 Satnam Kaur ....Petitioner

Versus

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Brijesh Nandan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) Present writ petition has been filed seeking grant of benefit of 23 years advance promotional increment in view of the policy of the Finance Department dated 23.04.1990 as amended from time to time. Counsel for the petitioner states that similar petitions i.e. CWP No.24407 of 2018 and other connected cases, have been disposed of by this Court, vide order dated 19.12.2018, keeping in view the order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.1013 of 2017 alongwith other connected cases, decided on 29.11.2018. Counsel for the petitioner further states that petitioner is seeking the similar direction as given by this Court while deciding CWP No.24407 of 2018 and other connected cases, decided on 19.12.2018. Notice of motion.

NARESH KUMAR 2019.05.31 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-15137-2019 -2On the asking of the Court, Mr. Parminder Singh-I, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-PSPCL and states that he has no objection in case prayer of the petitioner is accepted for the disposal of the present writ petition in terms of the order passed by this Court on 29.11.2018 in CWP No. 1013 of 2017 titled as Balvir Singh Vs. PSPCL and another.

Keeping in view of the prayer made by counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in CWP No.1013 of 2017 titled as Balvir Singh Vs. PSPCL and another, decided on 29.11.2018.

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) May 30, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2019.05.31 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh