Sukhwinder Singh @ Kala v. State Of Haryana




        

  

 

!"#"

$%  &'& ()*+,"$ - ("$.+ / 01 &&&&

"

"

$ - -#)# ( 

-3$ &&&&& #4 $ $

5 %  67 5& (

 2 0(  

 


 




 
 
 



0(  79 & 7  








  !"

#$ !#!!
%&

& 

 




 "'()!*
 

 



 
& 


 
 
 

 

+,
 

&

&


%
   
 
&

&

 

-


, 




 
&.
 




 


% 


"!

#/ !#!#


  
 

 
% 


!0 #"

!#!"
&

 
  

  

+,
 
1


&.
 


2 




"3#
 


 
.

 

 "'()!*
 


!# #$ !#!!

1


 


 
 2

.

.



 
% 

&




.


4')*)0*


56

1



  


 

 
+,
 
 

&
&. , 




 

 
  
6

.





 



  2#& ( 

 )$:;<
 
.




 



 

 



 
& 
1



 

% 



 


 


.


% 


6


 


 

.
 
"3 ""

!#!#




 



=   2#&  ! "< 
%

 









 
% 
 

 

7 

  
& 
%

  
 

 

 




 

7 


 
%
&

&

8   7
. 




%  

 
 
1
 
 


.




 
.

 
 
 
 &




.



 
!"

#$ !#!"
 
&



1


&.
 

.

 
 #$%&'( ! ") 

 %&* +
 ) 
%
 
&

 
&

.



 
& 
&

6






+,-   .





.

 , 
 




 
 








 
&.
 




. %




 
 


  
 
&
 
%

+,
 


 
& 
 
&
 

> 9

 
 
 






 




&8 9
 



.

()- #+6# !#

) *


&

 


 
&%
:
 

          

 !

"#$  %& ' (#)*
+   , , ---$$---$$--- .  /        &0! 1  *

+'  0' 2 

  0 '  ' '3$ 45        ()"*
+, , /  '     ,   - 6     /       

    /-   "#$*.+  %&      (#)*
+, ,78 9  :   &0  !  '      0     /        ,     '    ,    ;-   < /  

'  '   &  !   

' 0 /   0/'  / -  :  0-     &0!  ' '3$ 4 '      ,  ;-       ()", ,'  '      

  0 =  0 >? 

 '  2   (@A/' /                          

 0 /  0/

    ,          0  '    /  

 -      ,  5

?    %&    '   '   

/         >     0'5                '                 :  / 0  '   /    

           

      '  /0  /





            '  '    /    ,  ;-    B    0   %& ' /      

  /'  '  ='       >?     00  

    8 #: ,  '0 1    

 //

!   ,    / -  ! "0
1.1 

'  '    0  &0 ! '    >    

 ,   2 

 3+ +- 
4%  5

 & )

#2' '

  <      
*+' ()"*
+  , ,              '       <    

 0      ! (#)*
+  , ,),   

  '0



2    !   , 
 

., / -   ! "'   ! '     !  
# 

./  3+ "-  ! " '  0'   !   0     !     :  '     / !  

2 ' 

      &0!  

?   0/'    : 0  0  ! , / 2 6 & * ) 

'3$  ' '  '    ' '! 1  > C

 / *

+ >*

+ &0!  1 *

+!/0      ! 1   > C

 /*

+ >*

+

         /  /  '         '

   0'  '' / &0 ! 1 *

+D'0 - 

/   '     ! 1      !    0 1   !      0'              

 /         &0!  0/     ! 1  :          D

 ,   '  2  &0!      '       ,    /   /  ='             

      /

    , 8 4:   ,   <0           

      "(    
A
A    /            < %"@
@   /
A
A 

*,+   %&  /  

%#( (E@9*    %& +(@*+(@*,+ &  , (E.A :  &  D/ @</   > *

+  !     /&  ! 

@

2
 

./-  ! "2  

2  21-

- 7 %,,6  8

6 5  9 6     -  %,,65 +,**,



2  -,     

2   <  

  ! 

'-      > &    !       !       ,     =/ F 

0 

1 , <0%E@" 
A
A   /! //

 &0! 1 G *

+ E  0

 ,   0'

       !/   /    @H

 '   00 /    %&   $,0$(E

  '   

>/>   

   0/    &0!  ,  2  6   & * )                   /  0/         '              0'          , / 2 6 & * )'   

2 /  '   /-  ! "& * ) (A:>   0

  ,   <0      '            

   /      :,   '0    /          , 2 6 & * ) '     /    >  6            '  ((&   %0

(@
A
A  *I&

 DI5 +   I&J;8 A perusal of the above judgment would show that after considering the judgment of Division Bench and also the judgment

' passed in CRR No.1125 of 2020 titled as "Julfkar vs. State of Haryana", vide which the matter has been referred to a Division Bench, the petitioner therein was granted interim bail. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was arrested on 12.09.2020 and had moved an application under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. on 20.05.2022 i.e. after the expiry of 180 days. The challan was presented on 26.03.2021 but no FSL report was annexed with the challan and FSL report has not been submitted till date. The petitioner has been in custody since 12.09.2020 i.e. 1 year, 9 months and 29 days and the case is still pending for the submission of report of FSL and, thus, in view of the same, the conclusion of the trial is likely to take time.

Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances as also the order passed by the Coordinate Bench in Suresh's case (supra) case, the present revision petition is allowed at this stage and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail conditionally subject to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court/Duty Magistrate. It is, however, clarified that in case, the question of law is held against the present petitioner and is contrary to the law laid down in Ajit Singh alias Jeeta's case (supra), then, the State would be at liberty to seek cancellation/modification of this order, if warranted at that stage.  2 0(  7  )13 9     ;
 7  8< = ;
  &< 5