Satish v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

CRM-M No. 6553 of 2018 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 6553 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.2.2018 ...

Satish ................Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. R.S. Ghuman, Advocate and Mr. Chand Ram Narwal, Advocate for the petitioner. ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that a wrong affidavit was filed by respondents No.4 and 5, while approaching this Court seeking protection and as a matter of fact marriage between the present petitioner Satish and Sonam - respondent No.4 was subsisting at the time of filing of the petition, when she had sworn an affidavit that she was un-married. A further direction has been sought for registration of FIR under Sections 494, 120-B IPC. As far as registration of FIR under Section 494 IPC is concerned, the offence is non-cognizable. For that the petitioner may take recourse of filing a complaint in the court of competent Banita Chugh 2018.02.28 09:38 I am the author of this document

CRM-M No. 6553 of 2018 -2jurisdiction. Whereas with regard to the other grievances as contained in representation Annexure P-8, Superintendent of Police, Hisar, may look into the same and if he finds that some action in the matter is warranted, the needful be done in accordance with law expeditiously. With such observations, the petition stands disposed of. ( H.S. Madaan ) 27.2.2018 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No Banita Chugh 2018.02.28 09:38 I am the author of this document