High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/9632/2017allowed

Naveen v. State Of Haryana

2017-04-27Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-9632 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM-M-9632 of 2017 Date of Decision: 27.04.2017 Naveen ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Ashwani Gaur, Advocate for the petitioner.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 546 dated 03.10.2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 379-A (1), 506 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short, "IPC") at Police Station Sonipat City, District Sonipat. Heard.

Notice of motion.

On asking of the court, Ms. Hapreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court accepts notice and submits that intimation by Registry informing of fixation of the petition has already been received and record of the case is available with her.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 24.01.2017, the petitioner could not appear before the trial Court as he was out of station and his non-bailable warrants were issued. However, he surrendered on the same day and was taken into custody. Earlier the petitioner had been appearing regularly.

Jitender Kumar 2017.04.27 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-9632 of 2017 -2In view of above but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and keeping in view the fact that conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner-Naveen is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following terms:- (a) The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

(b) In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh. (c) He shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Court.

April 27, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.04.27 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH