Nitin Khosla And ANR v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 101 Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-24272 of 2025 Date of Decision: May 16, 2025 Nitin Khosla & another ..... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

State of Punjab ..... RESPONDENT(S)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL PRESENT: - Mr. Vipul Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jastej Singh, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Onkar S. Batalavi, Advocate with Mr. Damanjeet S. Batalavi, Advocate, for the complainant.

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (Oral) This is second petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 has been filed praying for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.152 dated 06.07.2024 (Annexure P-1) registered at Police Station, Bhawanigarh, District Sangrur, for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC.

2.

This Court vide orders dated 05.05.2025 and 06.05.2025, while issuing notice of motion, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioners, subject to their joining the investigation. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in pursuance to the order dated 06.05.2025, the petitioners have joined the investigation. 4.

Learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required. AVIN KUMAR 2025.05.16 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.

CRM No.24272 of 2025 [2] 5.

In view of the above, the order dated 06.05.2025 is made absolute.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) Judge May 16, 2025 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No AVIN KUMAR 2025.05.16 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.