High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRR/4251/2016dismissed

Priyanka Yadav v. State Of Haryana And Others

2017-02-07Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

CRR-4251-2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-4251-2016 Date of Decision:- 07.02.2017 Priyanka Yadav ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Present revision petition has been filed against order dated 02.09.2016 (Annexure P-1), passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari, whereby an application made by the petitioner to summon Karampal @ Kawarpal and Anil (respondent Nos.2 and 3), as additional accused, has been dismissed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that accused persons (respondent No.2 and 3) have committed a heinous offence as specific role has been attributed to them.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, going through the record, this Court is of the considered view that there was no evidence against the persons, who are sought to be summoned. Thus, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari, has rightly dismissed the Naresh Kumar 2017.02.13 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh application and the same have been passed after appreciating the evidence

CRR-4251-2016 -2in the correct prospective and does not require any interference. Such orders, containing valid reasons, cannot possibly be interfered with by this Court, in exercise of limited jurisdiction of this Court under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C., unless and until, the same is illegal, perverse and without jurisdiction. Since, no such patent illegality or legal infirmity has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner, so, the impugned orders deserves to be and is hereby maintained in the obtaining circumstances of the case.

In the light of aforesaid reasons, as there is no merit, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed as such. February 07, 2017 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2017.02.13 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh