Anoop And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.15457 of 2019 Date of decision:11.07.2019 Anoop and others ... Petitioners Vs.

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. B.S.Tewatia, Advocate for the petitioners.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) The order dated 13.04.2018, Annexure P-8 reveals that certain documents are still wanting in view of instructions dated 23.07.2014 (Annexure P-1).

I am of view that it is a case where evidence is required to be led by serving interrogatory and production of documents and in the absence of same, adverse inference under provisions of Section 114(g) of Indian Evidence Act, is liable to be drawn.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of Court for withdrawal of present writ petition with liberty to avail remedy of civil suit .

Ordered accordingly.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE July 11, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2019.07.12 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh