← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/23951/2026disposed of

Ifeanyi Bliss v. State Of Haryana

2026-04-30Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal2 pages

CRM-M-23951-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-23951-2026 Date of Decision: 30.04.2026 IFEANYI BLISS ....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL

Present:

Mr. Bhaskar Sorout, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 (corresponding Section 482 Cr.P.C) for quashing of order dated 15.09.2022 passed by ld. JMIC, Faridabad vide which bail order and bail bonds of the petitioner were cancelled and forfeited to the State and non-bailable warrants were issued against the petitioner in FIR NO. 631 dated 30.10.2015 under Sections 419,420,467,468,471,120-B, 201 IPC (Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 61(2), 238 of BNS) and 66-D IT Act registered at Police Station Central Faridabad District Faridabad and all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not appear before the learned trial Court due to some unavoidable circumstances. As such, ld. trial Court cancelled the bail orders of the petitioner and his bail bonds were ordered to be forfeited to the State and the RENU RAWAT 2026.05.01 16.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-23951-2026 petitioner was ordered to be summoned through non-bailable warrants of arrest. He further prays that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the proceedings before the Court and the impugned order dated 15.09.2022 be set aside. 3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the case file.

6.

In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court does not find any legitimate ground to interfere in the impugned order dated 15.09.2022 passed by ld. JMIC, Faridabad . However, in case the petitioner surrenders before the trial Court within a period of 07 days from today and moves an application for grant of regular bail, the trial Court is directed to consider and decide the same within a period of three days. 7.

With these observations, the present petition stands disposed of. (H.S.GREWAL) 30.04.2026 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.05.01 16.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh