High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRR/995/2015disposed of

Pawan Kumar v. Ut Of Chandigarh And ANR.

2016-09-21Mr. Justice Amit Rawal1 pages

DAILY LOK ADALAT BENCH NO.3 CRR-995-2015 PAWAN KUMAR V/S UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ANR.

* * * *

Present:

Mr. Amit Kashyap, Advocate alongwith Sh. Pawan Kumar-petitioner.

Mr. Sukant Gupta, APP, for U.T. Chd.

Mr. Sarvesh Gupta, Advocate alongwith Sh. Vijay Kumar (Legal Representative of Sh. Ved Parkash Gupta.) * * * * Statements of SarvSh. Vijay Kumar and Pawan Kumar have been recorded separately. Parties have settled the dispute between themselves. Petitioner has paid a sum of Rs. 2,50,000/- to Sh. Vijay Kumar (Legal Representative of Sh. Ved Parkash Gupta) and the matter has been settled between the parties. Both the parties express their desire that the offence be compounded in terms of Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Since the matter has been settled between the parties, we accept the revision petition and set aside the orders of the courts below and acquit the petitioner of the charge levelled. Revision petition is, accordingly, accepted.

(G.C. GARG) PRESIDENT (N.K. KAPOOR) MEMBER September 21, 2016 Naresh.k NARESH 2016.09.28 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document