Jagir Singh v. Jaswinder Singh




    
   



 Date of decision: 30th March, 2015  Jagir Singh  Petitioner

Versus

Jaswinder Singh  Respondent     !"

 #
  #
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Saravpreet Gurna, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Tanmoy Gupta, Advocate for the respondent.

 #
$

" Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record original deposit receipt whereby a sum of
45,000 has been deposited by way of 15% of the cheque amount to facilitate compounding of the offence.

Jaswinder Singh complainant who is present in Court and has been identified by his counsel Mr. Tanmoy Gupta, Advocate, has made a statement that he has received the cheque amount and that no amount is due and he has no objection if the matter is RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.31 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court

 

 compromised and the offence is compounded and the judgment of conviction is set aside, to which the petitioner convict Jagir Singh, who is also present in Court, has readily agreed and has prayed that leniency be shown to him and the matter be disposed off in those terms.

Heard Mr. Saravpreet Gurna, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr.Tanmoy Gupta, Advocate for the respondent. In view of the position of law laid down in %&'(&) #

)&*+,-#&./( &*&0&0! #112, since parties have effected compromise and settled their dispute, the courts are supposed to compound the offence to facilitate harmonious relationship and thus, in the light of this compromise, the offence is compounded and the judgment of conviction is set aside. The present revision petition stands disposed off in those terms.

 #
  

&)3+2$
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.31 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court