Seema And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Writ Petition No. 6961 of 2020 Date of Decision: 23.09. 2020 Seema and Another ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Deepak Kumar Baria, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Chetan Sharma, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

The writ petitioners pray for protection of their life and liberty from respondent No. 4 to 5 and their other relatives. The writ petitioners claim that they have married against the wishes of respondent No. 4 to 6 on 02.09.2020. Keeping in view the facts of the case, on 09.09.2020, the following order was passed by this Court:

"Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are receiving threats from respondent Nos.4 to 6 as they have entered into marriage on 02.09.2020 against the wishes of private respondents.

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2020.09.28 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Criminal Writ Petition No. 6961 of 2020 Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only, at this stage.

Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of official respondents. Counsel for the petitioners undertakes to forward the complete copy of the petition to the office of Advocate General Haryana through email, during the course of the day. Learned State counsel prays for time to verify the facts and the existence of alleged threat.

On his request, adjourned to 23.09.2020".

Mr. Chetan Sharma, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, on instructions from the Station House Officer, Police Station City Jagadhri, has submitted that respondent No. 4 to 6 have made a statement that they have no objection to the marriage of the writ petitioners and they will not interfere in their married life. He further submits that now the writ petitioners do not have any threat perception.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge September 23, 2020 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2020.09.28 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document