High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/9991/2017allowed

Baljeet v. State Of Haryana

2017-03-30Mr. Justice Girish Agnihotri2 pages

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-9991 of 2017 Date of Decision: 30.03.2017 Baljeet ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan.

Present:

Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Ms. Kirti Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent.

Shekher Dhawan, J.

Through the present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.25 dated 31.01.2017, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323 & 324 IPC and Section 3(1)(X) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, at Police Station Narnaund, District Hisar. Seeking regular bail for the petitioner, learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 31.1.2017; there is no other criminal case pending against him and even if the averments made in the FIR are accepted as the gospel truth, which the petitioner does not admit, only a simple injury has been attributed to him. Learned State counsel submits that though the investigation is still going on, yet the petitioner is no longer required for any further Deepak Kumar Bhardwaj 2017.03.31 13:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document investigation.

Criminal Misc. No. M-9991 of 2017 Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered view that petitioner deserves to be admitted to regular bail. Thus, present petition is hereby accepted and petitioner, namely Baljeet is directed to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Hisar.

Nothing said here-in-above shall be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. If the petitioner is found indulging in any criminal act or misusing the concession of bail granted by this Court, it would be open to the State to seek cancellation of bail granted vide this order by filing an appropriate application before the competent Court/this Court. (Shekher Dhawan) Judge March 30, 2017 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Deepak Kumar Bhardwaj 2017.03.31 13:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document