Sudesh v. State Of Haryana & ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRR-4599-2016 Date of Decision:- 12.12.2016 Sudesh ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another ....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:
Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner intends to withdraw the present revision petition. Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
However, keeping in view the age of the petitioner, her personal presence is exempted before the trial Court, subject to the following conditions:- (i) petitioner shall be represented through counsel; (ii) shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; (iii) shall not dispute her identity as an accused: (iv) shall has no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in her absence but in the presence of her counsel; (v) shall appear before the trial Court as and when required by the trial Court; and (vi) any other condition which the learned trial Court may impose. December 12, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2016.12.13 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh