Sourav @ Murli v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29004-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.10.2022 SOURAV @ MURLI

...Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Kushagra Beniwal, Advocate for Mr. Ketan Antil, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pawan Kumar Jhanda, AAG Haryana.

Mr. Rahul Jaswal, Advocate for the complainant.

**** HARNARESH SINGH GILL , J.

(ORAL) Through this petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.120 dated 20.03.2022, registered under Sections 323, 34 and 506 IPC and Section 307 IPC (added later on), at Police Station Sonepat Sadar, District Sonepat.

Vide order dated 11.07.2022 passed by this Court, the petitioner had been granted ad interim pre-arrest bail and directed to join the investigation.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Ramesh Kumar, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is now not required for any further investigation.

AMAN JAIN 2022.10.11 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-29004-2022 (O&M) -2In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 11.07.2022 granting interim bail to the petitioner, is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

11.10.2022 (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) Aman Jain JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2022.10.11 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment