Sunil v. Urmil
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRR(F) No.7 of 2015 Date of decision: 03.05.2017 Sunil ....Petitioner
Versus
Urmil ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL
Present:
Mr. D.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Vikrant Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.
REKHA MITTAL J. (Oral) Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present petition may be disposed of by modification of the impugned order that the respondent shall be entitled to maintenance @ Rs.9,000/- per month from the date of filing of the application i.e. 09.07.2013. Disposed of accordingly.
(REKHA MITTAL) JUDGE 03.05.2017 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No Mohd. Yakub 2017.05.05 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh