Kuldip Kaur v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14391-2022 Date of Decision : March 27, 2025 KULDIP KAUR -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

Present:

Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate with Mr. Amanpreet Kooner, Advocate and Mr. Jasreet Singh Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pardeep Bajaj, D.A.G., Punjab.

Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate for the respondent No.5.

*** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1.

Through the instant writ petition, prayer is made for issuance of directions upon the official respondents to examine the grievance of the petitioner, as expressed by her in the complaint (Annexure P-14). 2.

Consequent upon issuance of notice on the instant writ petition, the official respondents No.1 to 3 filed the short reply dated 03.07.2023, disclosing therein that, pursuant to the making of complaint by the petitioner, two FIRs have already been registered against the respondent No.5- Harjit Kaur. Not only this, petitioner's possession over the house in question has also been restored. 3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the disclosures (supra) made in the short reply and submits that, as of now, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, hence he does not want DEVINDER YADAV 2025.03.28 09:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-14391-2022 to press the instant writ petition at this stage. However, he seeks liberty for the petitioner to, in case any grievance out of the present dispute arises in future, approach the competent authority/forum for redressal thereof. 4.

In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed, as not pressed at this stage, however, with liberty (supra). (KULDEEP TIWARI) March 27, 2025 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2025.03.28 09:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment