← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/25467/2025allowed

Vikram/Vikey And Another v. State Of Haryana And Another

2025-08-05Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal2 pages

CRM-M-25467-2025 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25467-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 05.08.2025 Vikram/Vikey and others ... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Ms. Nidhi Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioners. *** H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) CRM-26068-2025 This application has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for placing on record the copy of the original affidavits of the complainant and victim in support of compromise effected as Annexure A-1. Allowed as prayed for and the copy of the original affidavits of the complainant and victim in support of compromise effected as Annexure A-1 is ordered to be taken on record.

Main case 1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-'BNSS') for quashing of FIR No. 0049 dated 17.02.2025 under Sections 115,140(3), 190, 191(2), 333, 351(3) of BNS registered at Police Station Pataudi Gurugram and subsequent proceeding arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise deeds dated 24.04.2025. 2.

Notice of motion.

Renu Rawat 2025.08.07 14.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-25467-2025 (O&M) -23.

Mr. Tapan Masta, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Learned State counsel states that no other FIR has been registered against the petitioners and they have no known criminal antecedents.

4.

Mr. Ravi Ambawata, Advocate appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. He confirms the factum of the compromise having been effected between the parties and states that he has no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question.

5.

In that view of the matter, even if this case is taken to its logical conclusion, it would only be an exercise in futility as the parties have already settled their differences. Therefore, no purpose would be served in wasting the time and resources of the State in pursuing this case to its pre-ordained end. It would, therefore, be better to give a quietus to the issue at this stage. 6.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 0049 dated 17.02.2025 under Sections 115,140(3), 190, 191(2), 333, 351(3) of BNS registered at Police Station Pataudi Gurugram and subsequent proceeding arising therefrom shall stand quashed on the basis of the compromise deeds dated 24.04.2025 subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- each as costs to be paid to the High Court Civil Dispensary.

7.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (H.S.GREWAL) JUDGE 05.08.2025 renu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Renu Rawat 2025.08.07 14.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document