Shakti Singh v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CRWP No. 1147 of 2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. 1147 of 2015 Decided on : - 10.09.2015 Shakti Singh . . . Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SARON HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEKHER DHAWAN PRESENT: Mr. Kanwar Satbir Singh, Advocate for Mr. R.K. Bagga, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Raj Kumar Makkad, D.A.G., Haryana for the State.

**** S.S. Saron, J.

Learned State counsel has filed reply by way of affidavit of Sh. Sher Singh, Superintendent of Prison, District Prison, Karnal, on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. The same is taken on record. 2.

The petitioner prays for directing the Divisional Commissioner, Rohtak Range, District Rohtak and District Magistrate, Shamli, U.P. (respondents No.2 to 4), to decide his application for Agriculture Parole, which is pending 3.

According to the reply, that has been filed and taken on record, it is, inter alia, stated that parole/release of petitioner for agricultural works has been considered. The petitioner has been granted six weeks parole by the Divisional Commissioner, Rohtak Range, District Rohtak (respondent NARESH KUMAR 2015.09.16 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRWP No. 1147 of 2015 -2No.2), vide order dated 08.09.2015. The petitioner has been directed to furnish requisite surety bonds before the concerned District Magistrate, Shamli (respondent No.4) for his release on parole. In the circumstances, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous, as the petitioner has been granted the necessary relief. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous.

(S.S. SARON) JUDGE (SHEKHER DHAWAN) September 10, 2015 JUDGE naresh.k.

NARESH KUMAR 2015.09.16 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh