Ruldu Ram v. State Of Haryana And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11731 of 2013 Date of decision:07.02.2017 Ruldu Ram ... Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana and others ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. S.S.Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Singh Mann, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Ashwani, Advocate for respondents No.5 and 6.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court for withdrawal of the writ petition on the ground that the parties have entered into compromise, therefore, no cause of action survives in the present writ petition with liberty to revive the same in case something survives. In view of the aforementioned, the present writ petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE February 07, 2017 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2017.02.08 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh