Patram & ANR v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.7376 of 2018 Date of decision: 21.02.2018 Patram and another ....Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present:
Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioners.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioners restricts his argument, at this stage, only to the extent that a direction be issued to the Investigating Officer to decide the representation (Annexure P4) vide which it is stated that petitioner No.1 - Patram and petitioner No.2 - Ram Kumar @ Ram Kanwar Singh were not present at the spot and have relied upon certain documents (Annexures P2 and P3).
In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Investigating Officer to decide the representation (Annexure P4) filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law after considering the documents (Annexures P2 and P3) and in case the same are found to be genuine, the Investigating Officer will submit a report in this regard before the trial Court.
Needful be done within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE 21.02.2018 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No Mohd. Yakub 2018.02.22 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh