Subhash Chander Siani v. State Of Haryana Etc




    
       Date of decision: 21st September, 2015  Subhash Chander  Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others  Respondents  

   

 !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. N.P. Jaitley, Advocate for Mr. K.S. Jaitley, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 4.

Mr. Tarun Datta, Advocate for respondent No.6.

None for respondents No.5 and 7.

 !
"#  $ Respondent No.65Babu Ali @ Ramesh @ Mohd. Khurshid is present in Court in person along with his counsel Mr. Tarun Datta, Advocate, who has filed his power of attorney. It has been submitted by learned State counsel on instructions from SI Satya Narayan, Police Station Ambala City, that FIR No.133 dated 25.04.2015 under Sections 363/366/120B IPC has RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.21 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    been registered at police station Ambala City regarding disappearance of the alleged detenue Damini. It has been assured by the learned State counsel that the matter is being hotly pursued and the whereabouts of the couple are not located.

Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement withdrawing the present petition, however reserving his rights to avail appropriate remedy within the framework of law.

Allowed to do so.

The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.

#  !
$   !%&'%()%*" 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.21 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court