Kunal v. State Of Haryana And ANR

2023:PHHC:128648

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

236-A CRR-1336-2017 Date of Decision: 04.10.2023 Kunal Verma .... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Ms. Sushma, Advocate for Mr. G.P. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Brijesh Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

None for respondent No. 2.

NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of, as such as, the petitioner has been acquitted by the trial Court.

On instructions, learned counsel for the State does not dispute aforesaid fact and submits that the petitioner has already been acquitted by the learned trial Court vide judgment dated 09.08.2022. In view of the above, the present revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 04.10.2023 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2023.10.05 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment