Amandeep Singh v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.207 CRM-M No.32481 of 2021 Date of Decision: 10.01.2022 Amandeep Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Samina Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) The petitioner herein has sought the relief of anticipatory bail in the criminal case arising out of DDR No.26 dated 16.06.2018 entered at Police Station Sirhali, District Tarn Taran, under Sections 326, 341, 323, 506, 148 and 149 IPC as the cross-case in the FIR bearing No.54 dated 17.05.2018 registered at the same Police Station, under Sections 341, 323, 324, 506, 148 and 149 IPC (wherein the offence under Section 326 IPC is stated to have been added later-on).

Learned State counsel, on the instructions from ASI Gurnaj Singh, from the above-said Police Station, apprises the Court that in compliance of the order dated 15.09.2021, the petitioner has joined in the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required and he is also not involved in any other criminal case of the similar nature. NEETU RANI 2022.01.10 17:00 I attest to the accuracy of this order PHHC

CRM-M No.32481 of 2021 -2- .....

In view of the afore-said submission as made by learned State counsel, the instant petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, as extended to the petitioner by this Court vide the order dated 15.09.2021, is hereby made absolute.

However, the petitioner shall continue to join in the investigation as and when required/called upon to do so and shall also strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) 10.01.2022 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2022.01.10 17:00 I attest to the accuracy of this order PHHC