Sawaran Singh And Others v. State Of Punjab And Another

CRM-M-38436 of 2020 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38436 of 2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.4.2021 ...

Sawaran Singh and others ................Petitioners vs.

State of Punjab and another .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. Digvijay Nagpal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Ghuman, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Case taken up through video conferencing.

Petitioners - Sawaran Singh, Harcharan Singh, Tek Singh, Jaswant Singh and Mehma Singh, have brought the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. being accused in FIR No. 0067 dated 14.4.2020, for offences under Sections 324, 323, 148, 149 and 188 IPC, registered at Police Station Gidderbaha, District Sri Muktsar Sahib, for quashing of abovesaid FIR, alongwith consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise, stated to have been effected between them and complainant Gursewak Singh -

CRM-M-38436 of 2020 -2arrayed as respondent No.2. When the petition came up for hearing on 28.1.2021, notice of motion was ordered to be issued. Respondent No. 1 - State of Punjab through State counsel, whereas respondent No.2 through Mr. Paramvir Singh, Advocate, had put in appearance. Then in light of the contention that parties have since effected compromise, they were directed to put in appearance before the Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Gidderbaha, to get their statements recorded with regard to compromise and the said Court was directed to send a report to this Court.

Report has been received from Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gidderbaha, in terms of which complainant Gursewak Singh, and accused, namely, Sawaran Singh, Harcharan Singh, Tek Singh, Jaswant Singh and Mehma Singh, had appeared there and their statements were recorded, in terms of which they have admitted to have entered into a voluntary compromise, with free will, without any pressure, coercion or undue influence. Further complainant has stated that he has no objection if the FIR in question is quashed by this Court. There is nothing on record to doubt the genuineness of the compromise so arrived at between the parties. It has been reported that no accused has been declared proclaimed offender in the FIR in question. Alongwith the report copies of statement of the complainant and the accused party, have been annexed. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned State counsel, besides going through the record. Keeping in view the fact that the dispute between the

CRM-M-38436 of 2020 -3parties has been resolved amicably, which appears to have been arrived at between them voluntarily without any threat or coercion and in terms of ratio of the authority reported as Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, where in para 28, it has been held as under :- "The compromise, in a modern society, is the sine qua non of harmony and orderly behaviour. It is the soul of justice and if the power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is used to enhance such a compromise which, in turn, enhances the social amity and reduces friction, then it truly is "finest hour of justice".

Disputes which have their genesis in a matrimonial discord, landlord-tenant matters, commercial transactions and other such matters can safely be dealt with by the Court by exercising its powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. in the event of a compromise, but this is not to say that the power is limited to such cases. There can never be any such rigid rule to prescribe the exercise of such power, especially in the absence of any premonitions to forecast and predict eventualities which the cause of justice may throw up during the course of a litigation."

The compromise is in interest of peace and tranquility in the society and for such like reasons this Court can quash the FIR and ancillary

CRM-M-38436 of 2020 -4proceedings exercising power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., it appears to be a fit case to exercise such powers.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed and the abovesaid FIR alongwith ancillary proceedings are hereby quashed. ( H.S. Madaan ) 20.4.2021 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No