Tarif @ Hodal v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.7644 of 2018 Date of decision: 23.04.2018 Tarif @ Hodal ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present:
Mr. Barjinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Arjun Atri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Himmat Singh, DAG, Haryana.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral) Counsel for the State, on instructions from HC Mohammad Hussain, submits that despite the interim protection granted to the petitioner vide order dated 06.03.2018 to appear before the Investigating Officer, he has not appeared. It is further submitted that even on 19.03.2018, one more opportunity was granted to the petitioner and it was clearly observed in the order dated 19.03.2018 that in case the petitioner failed to join the investigation, the interim bail granted to him vide order dated 06.03.2018 shall stand vacated on the next date of hearing.
Since the counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has failed to join the investigation, the present petition is dismissed. (ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE 23.04.2018 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No Mohd. Yakub 2018.04.24 09:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh